Very Good Facebook Posting

PSALM 14:1 (KJV):

"THE FOOL HATH SAID IN HIS HEART, THERE IS NO GOD. THEY ARE CORRUPT, THEY HAVE DONE ABOMINABLE WORKS, THERE IS NONE THAT DOETH GOOD."

---

An Essay on Science, Evolution vs. Creationism, and the Evidence for God in Nature

Science and faith often find themselves at odds in modern discourse, particularly when it comes to the debate between evolution and creationism. On one side, the theory of evolution, championed by Charles Darwin in the 19th century, posits that life forms evolved gradually through natural selection over millions of years. On the other side, creationism maintains that a Creator deliberately designed life and the universe. But what does science truly say? Can it confirm the biblical account of creation, and does it show evidence for the existence of a Creator?

The Evidence for God in Nature

The Bible tells us that God's fingerprints are all over creation, from the stars to the smallest creatures. Romans 1:20 (KJV) declares, "For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse." Creation itself, according to the Apostle Paul, provides clear evidence of a Creator.

This is not a vague or abstract claim but one that can be substantiated by natural evidence. Take, for example, the fine-tuning of the universe. The laws of physics, the precise measurements of the speed of light, the gravitational constant, and the Earth's distance from the sun—all these factors are finely tuned to make life possible. If any of these constants were even slightly different, life would be impossible. This "fine-tuning" strongly suggests intentional design rather than random chance.

Furthermore, the complexity of life itself, particularly at the molecular and cellular levels, is astonishing. The human cell, with its intricate machinery for DNA replication, protein synthesis, and energy production, is far more complex than anything humans have ever built. This suggests a designer who fashioned life with an intricate plan in mind. As Dr. Michael Behe, a prominent biochemist, argues in his book Darwin's Black Box, some biological systems are "irreducibly complex"—they cannot function unless all of their parts are present and working together from the start. This challenges the gradual, step-by-step development posited by Darwinian evolution.

The Christian Roots of Science

Many of the most notable scientists throughout history believed in a Creator, and their work was rooted in the premise that the universe was designed with order and purpose. They didn’t see science and faith as opposing forces, but rather, they viewed scientific discovery as a way to uncover the mysteries of God's creation.

For example, Sir Isaac Newton, who formulated the laws of motion and universal gravitation, famously said, "This most beautiful system of the sun, planets, and comets could only proceed from the counsel and dominion of an intelligent and powerful Being." Newton, a devout Christian, saw his work as revealing the majesty of God’s creation.

Similarly, Johannes Kepler, who discovered the laws of planetary motion, believed that his scientific work was a way to "think God's thoughts after Him." Kepler and Newton were not anomalies. Many scientists, including Louis Pasteur, Michael Faraday, and James Clerk Maxwell, were motivated by their Christian faith and saw science as a means to glorify God.

Young Earth and Creationism

While many in the scientific community accept the theory of an old Earth and the gradual evolution of life, there is substantial evidence from both nature and Scripture to support a young Earth perspective. Young Earth Creationism (YEC) holds that the Earth is only thousands, not billions, of years old, and that the biblical account of creation in Genesis is a literal historical record.

One key argument for a young Earth is the presence of soft tissue and DNA in fossils, which should have decayed over millions of years. Recent discoveries of such materials in dinosaur fossils challenge the idea of a 65-million-year-old Earth and point to a much younger timeframe.

Another point of evidence is the rate at which the Earth's magnetic field is decaying. If the Earth were billions of years old, the magnetic field would have decayed to zero, but measurements show it’s still strong, suggesting a much younger age. The same can be said for the decay of the Earth's rotation, which is gradually slowing. If the Earth were billions of years old, this process would have long since stopped.

In addition, the fossil record is more consistent with the biblical account of a global flood than the gradual accumulation of layers over eons. The evidence of rapid burial in sedimentary rock layers, the fossilization of soft tissues, and the presence of marine fossils on mountaintops points to a catastrophic event, like the Flood described in Genesis.

Evolution and the Debate

Evolutionary theory, at its core, posits that life as we know it arose through random mutations and natural selection. But many Christians, including scientists, argue that evolution does not fully account for the complexity of life and the fine-tuning of the universe. As Dr. John Lennox, a Christian professor of mathematics and philosophy of science, argues, evolution may explain how species change over time, but it cannot explain the origin of life itself, or the origin of the information encoded in DNA.

The concept of "macroevolution," which suggests that one species can evolve into an entirely different species, remains a contentious issue. No conclusive evidence has ever been found that definitively proves macroevolution in a laboratory setting. Fossil records show some instances of adaptation and speciation, but these variations fall within the boundaries of existing species, not the emergence of entirely new kinds of life.

The debate on evolution often centers on the "mystery of origins." How did life begin? How did complex biological structures evolve? Creationism, with its doctrine of intelligent design, offers a solution that evolution does not. It suggests that life did not arise by chance but was designed by a Creator who imbued creation with purpose.

Conclusion: The Creator’s Evidence in Science

Ultimately, science is not the enemy of faith. The overwhelming complexity and beauty of the universe point to a Designer. The history of science shows that many of its greatest minds were men and women of faith who believed that through studying the universe, they were uncovering the mind of God.

The evidence for a Creator is not just a matter of theological belief but a question of logical inquiry. From the fine-tuning of the universe to the complexity of DNA, to the many contributions of scientists who started from the premise of a Creator, there is ample evidence that points to the truth of the biblical creation account. The fool may say in his heart, "There is no God," but the evidence in nature and science cries out that the Creator is real, and He is worthy of our worship.

 Not ashamed of Jesus Christ

 

Joe Stromberg ··