CAN ELDERS AUTHORIZE WHAT GOD HAS NOT?
CAN ELDERS AUTHORIZE WHAT GOD HAS NOT?
Joshua Alexander
An increasing number of congregations of the Lord’s church have begun involving women in their worship services in ways unfamiliar to earlier generations. Women have always played an essential and honorable role in service to God. In recent years, however, women have been increasingly invited to serve in roles historically filled by men. These roles may include making announcements to the congregation, leading the congregation in public prayer, participating in praise teams that lead congregational singing, reading Scripture from the pulpit, and serving in nearly every visible leadership role in worship except preaching the sermon, though some are already doing that. [A side note to this is that some schools (colleges & universities) associated with members of the church of Christ are using women in unauthorized capacities.
It should be noted that this development is not entirely new. Variations of this practice have been present for decades. Over time, several arguments have been offered to justify these changes. Some have suggested that the apostle Paul’s instructions were merely the product of a misogynistic culture [hatred or dislike of women]. Others have argued that the instructions were culturally bound to the first century and therefore not binding today. Still others have maintained that the roles in question do not actually constitute positions of leadership.
More recently, another argument has gained attention. Some contend that if the eldership grants women the authority to serve in these capacities, then the women themselves cannot be guilty of “usurping authority,” because the authority was given to them by the elders. Frequently, when a congregation makes such adjustments, a statement is released explaining that the elders have been “restudying” the issue and have therefore decided to expand the roles women may serve within the congregation.
This reasoning raises an important question: if an eldership determines that something is authorized, does that make it so? To examine the logic of this argument, it may be helpful to apply the same reasoning to other matters. Suppose an eldership were to decide that the congregation should begin using instrumental music in worship. Would that decision grant the congregation the authority to introduce instruments into their worship of God? Some might argue that it would. Consider another example: the frequency of the Lord’s Supper. If the eldership decided the congregation should partake of the Lord’s Supper once a month rather than every week, would that decision make the practice of monthly observance scriptural? No, not at all!
The principle can be extended even further. What if an eldership were to declare that homosexual marriage is no longer sinful? Would such a declaration grant God’s approval? What if they were to claim that murder is no longer wrong in God’s sight? Clearly, no one would seriously suggest that an eldership possesses the authority to redefine morality itself.
When the principle is applied consistently, the conclusion becomes clear: an eldership does not have the authority to authorize something that God has not authorized. When Peter wrote, “If any man speak, let him speak as the oracles of God” (1 Peter 4:11), his instruction applied to every person, including elders. The authority the eldership possess is real, but it is also limited. Their responsibility is to teach and guide according to what God has revealed, not to speak as though they themselves were God. Their job is to see to it that what the congregation does (of which they have oversight), is done in accordance to, and authorized by, God’s Word.
The question of what is scripturally authorized can ultimately be settled only by God. If an eldership possessed the power to create its own universe, design its own heaven, build and die for its own church, then perhaps it could structure that church however it wished. But since the church belongs to the One who did all of those things, our responsibility is to submit to His will.
This brings us back to the central question: is it wrong for women to lead in worship? Scripture states, “I will therefore that men pray every where, lifting up holy hands, without wrath and doubting. In like manner also, that women adorn themselves in modest apparel, with shamefacedness and sobriety; not with broided hair, or gold, or pearls, or costly array; But (which becometh women professing godliness) with good works. Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection. But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence. For Adam was first formed, then Eve. And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression” (1 Tim. 2:8-14). Notice verse 8, men can pray every where, that is not said of women.
If a woman stands before the congregation to lead public prayer, direct congregational singing (even by way of a so-called praise team), or guide the assembly in any other role that requires the congregation to follow her lead, then how can we honestly say she is learning in silence with all subjection? Can it truly be said that she is not exercising authority over every man present when she leads and directs them in worship? Certainly, any time someone is in front of a crowd, inviting them to follow their “lead,” it cannot reasonably be said that they are not leading.
It is also difficult to maintain a consistent distinction between leading prayer and preaching a sermon. If a woman can approach God on behalf of the congregation in prayer, why could she not approach the congregation on behalf of God in preaching? The reasoning that allows one while forbidding the other is difficult to sustain. If the principle is accepted, both would logically follow, yet Scripture authorizes neither.
Ultimately, the issue is one of submission. Everyone, men and women, must be willing to submit to God. Rather than asking, “What do I want?” or even “What does the congregation want?” The more important question is, “What does God want?” When that question is honestly asked, the proper response is to follow His will.
Recognizing that women are not authorized to lead in public worship does not diminish their value or importance within the congregation. Scripture consistently affirms the indispensable role women play in the life of God’s people. However, in the home and in the church, God has assigned different roles to men and women. God’s people should seek to acknowledge and celebrate these distinctions rather than attempting to erase them.
Many of the pressures to redefine these roles come from the broader feminist movement, which challenges the idea that men and women have distinct responsibilities. Some modern ideologies suggest that gender is fluid and that men and women are essentially interchangeable. Christians should always measure such claims against the teaching of Scripture, clearly seeing they are false at their core.
In the end, the question is not whether God’s design aligns with modern cultural trends. The question is whether we are willing to trust that His way is best. Throughout history, God’s instructions have always proven to be far superior to man’s. For that reason, believers should humbly seek to follow them, confident that God’s way is always the right way.
1506 Roundabout Circle
Searcy, AR 72143
Joshua.alexanderrr@gmail.com



