A Biblical Portrait of Evangelizing Those Who Don’t Believe in God or the Bible
A Biblical Portrait of Evangelizing Those Who Don’t Believe in God or the Bible
When considering the portrait of evangelism in the New Testament, much of what we witness involves Christians attempting to convert Jews—those who were already “Bible-believers” (at least, believers in the Old Testament). Thus, we see the Christian evangelists regularly citing passages from the Old Testament in an attempt to convince Jews that, for example, Jesus is the long-awaited, Old Testament prophesied Messiah. But what does biblical evangelism look like when a Christian teaches a non-Bible-believer?
At various times over the years, we have witnessed Christians dismiss the study of Christian evidences and apologetics, saying things like, “I didn’t need to study those things when I was converted. So, I don’t see the point.” Or, “Studying about the existence of God, Genesis, and atheism is not really learning about Jesus, so that’s not saving souls.” Or, “All we need is to quote the Bible to people. That should be all we need to be saved.” Subsequently, such individuals fail to promote—much less teach—the study of apologetics and Christian evidences.
With such a mindset among some, should we be surprised to find that 60-80% of youth are leaving Christianity today because their faith has crumbled?1 They are unable to defend their faith (i.e., because they cannot engage in apologetics). They have accepted the lie that there is no evidence for Christianity (unlike evolution or the Big Bang Theory, they say) and that it requires a “blind” faith (i.e., they have not studied Christian evidences). With such a mindset being promoted, should we be surprised to find that 24% of Americans are now naturalists, rejecting a God as playing a role in human existence,2 or that 80% of Americans now reject the inspiration of the Bible?3 Should we be further surprised to find that 29% of Americans believe the Bible to be, not only uninspired, but comprised of a group of man-made fables, history, and moral precepts?4 Should we be surprised that 58% of Americans now accept evolution, rejecting the foundation for the entire Christian faith—the teachings of the book of Genesis, like a literal Creation, a literal Adam and Eve, a first sin in the Garden, and a global Flood?5 The foundations of the Christian religion in America have been severely eroded, and, “If the foundations are destroyed, what can the righteous do?” (Psalm 11:3). If a person rejects the inspiration of the Bible, he will no more be converted when a Christian quotes from it than the Christian would be converted to Islam when a Muslim quotes the Qur’an to him. There are more fundamental issues that must first be addressed.
A study of Paul’s evangelistic approach in Acts 17 is enlightening when considering how one should go about attempting to convert those who do not believe in the Bible or God. After all, that is precisely what Paul was called upon to do that notable day almost 2,000 years ago. In Acts 17:15, we find Paul being conducted by other Christians to Athens to commence the one-day sailing journey to Corinth, no doubt from the famous Athens port of Piraeus. Before departure from Athens, however, he had to await (apparently for some days) the arrival of Silas and Timothy. Athens was the great Grecian city of Gentile philosophers and debaters over the centuries, including Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, and Epicurus.
As he waited, he apparently explored enough of the city to observe that “the city was given over to idols” (vs. 16). It comes as no surprise to read that Paul could not help but address the issue. Verse 16 says that “his spirit was provoked within him” over the idolatry, leading to his daily evangelism in Athens’ public marketplace as he waited for his colleagues (vs. 17). When some of the Athenian philosophers heard Paul, they were intrigued enough by the new message being conveyed that they “took him” (“took hold of him”—vs. 19, ASV, RSV).
They then brought him up the 375-foot ascent to the supreme council of the Athenians, the Areopagus, named for the hill upon which they met—“Ares’ Hill” (or Mars’ Hill, using the Roman name for Ares). Mars’ Hill was the legendary place in Greek mythology where the other gods put Mars (Ares in Greek) on trial, accusing him of murdering the god Poseidon’s son, Halirrhothius. Here, in the first century, the Athenian philosophers gathered in the shadow of the nearby famous Acropolis citadel and the Parthenon, already in existence at the time and visible from the Hill. Paul then has a momentous chance to teach the academics of the world—the Gentile Ph.D.’s of the first century—the truth. As it does today, the teachings of the academics could no doubt trickle down to the masses over the coming years, making Paul’s opportunity an important one. What would Paul choose to say to these Gentile academics? The answer is highly relevant in the increasingly secular society in which Americans live.
Then Paul stood in the midst of the Areopagus and said, “Men of Athens, I perceive that in all things you are very religious; for as I was passing through and considering the objects of your worship, I even found an altar with this inscription:
TO THE UNKNOWN GOD.
Therefore, the One whom you worship without knowing, Him I proclaim to you: God, who made the world and everything in it, since He is Lord of heaven and earth, does not dwell in temples made with hands. Nor is He worshiped with men’s hands, as though He needed anything, since He gives to all life, breath, and all things. And He has made from one blood every nation of men to dwell on all the face of the earth, and has determined their preappointed times and the boundaries of their dwellings, so that they should seek the Lord, in the hope that they might grope for Him and find Him, though He is not far from each one of us; for in Him we live and move and have our being, as also some of your own poets have said, ‘For we are also His offspring.’ Therefore, since we are the offspring of God, we ought not to think that the Divine Nature is like gold or silver or stone, something shaped by art and man’s devising. Truly, these times of ignorance God overlooked, but now commands all men everywhere to repent, because He has appointed a day on which He will judge the world in righteousness by the Man whom He has ordained. He has given assurance of this to all by raising Him from the dead” (Acts 17:22-31).
Does God (through Paul) teach the Athenians a Bible lesson? Interestingly, He does not. After all, why would He? These Gentile philosophers would likely know very little about the Hebrew Scriptures, if anything, not being Jews. Much of the New Testament had yet to be written. The philosophers had already made it clear that the things Paul was teaching—i.e., New Testament teachings—were new concepts to them (vss. 18-21). So, of course they would not have believed in the Bible, making any quotations from the Bible irrelevant to them at that point in their understanding. As logical people, they would (and should) no doubt first want proof of the Bible’s inspiration by God before they would care what it says. Further, they would not even know Who the God that inspired the Bible is (prompting Paul’s comments about that God), much less believe that He exists.
So, what does Paul choose to say? Does he encourage them to close their eyes and simply feel God’s presence in their hearts? Does he tell them they must choose to blindly believe in the God of the Bible without evidence at all? Does he preach a Bible lesson to them?
He reasons with the Athenians, giving a defense (apologia) of the truth. In other words, he engages in apologetics. He uses logic to help point them towards the true God, but he never quotes from Scripture, since a foundation must first be laid. Interestingly, in fact, he quotes from their own philosophers—their own doctrines. He “meets them where they are,” starting from the doctrines with which they are familiar and comfortable. He becomes “all things to all men, that [he] might by all means save some” (1 Corinthians 9:22).
About what does he reason with the philosophers? Since his audience is comprised of philosophers, he uses philosophy. He reasons with them, alluding to three classical arguments for the existence of God: the Cosmological Argument (vs. 24), the Teleological Argument (vss. 25-26), and the Intuitional Argument (vs. 27).6 He then briefly mentions repentance, Judgment Day, and alludes to Jesus—though he does not actually use His name at this point in his evangelism. He merely calls Him “a man.”7 Considering that he was not primarily addressing atheists, but polytheists, his message is not rejected to this point in Paul’s sermon. Paul finally works up to the culmination of his message, briefly mentioning Jesus’ resurrection (again, without mentioning Jesus’ name). Here, Paul is interrupted and, as would be expected (and which Paul, no doubt, anticipated—hence waiting until the end of his speech to mention it), his audience realizes the significance of Paul’s claim about Jesus’ resurrection (implying the reality of life after death, which the philosophers of the day staunchly rejected).
What happens? The same things that happen today in evangelism. Some mock him (vs. 32). Some are intrigued but more apathetic, claiming to want to hear more information from Paul later (vs. 32). Some are open to the truth enough to “join him.” The underlying Greek suggests they clung closely to him, joining and associating themselves with him.8 Paul’s goal is met: he (like Jesus so often did) gave just enough information to sift those genuine truth seekers from the group. He no doubt further instructed those Gentiles who joined him at that point (including reasoning about the Bible’s origin and message, Jesus, salvation, the Church, etc.). The result? “[S]ome men joined him and believed [i.e., became Christians], among them Dionysius the Areopagite, a woman named Damaris, and others with them” (vs. 34). Apologetics works. It converts people. It is an essential tool in the evangelist’s arsenal when converting those who do not already believe in God or His Word.
Endnotes
1 Kevin Cain (2019), “Why Are We Losing Them When They Leave for College?” Apologetics Press, https://apologeticspress.org/why-are-we-losing-them-when-they-leave-for-college-5738/.
2 Megan Brenan (2024), “Majority Still Credits God for Humankind, but not creationism,” GALLUP online, July 22, https://news.gallup.com/poll/647594/majority-credits-god-humankind-not-creationism.aspx.
3 Frank Newport (2022), “Fewer in U.S. Now See Bible as Literal Word of God,” GALLUP online, July 6, https://news.gallup.com/poll/394262/fewer-bible-literal-word-god.aspx.
4 Ibid.
5 Brenan.
6 For a deeper study of these arguments see Dave Miller, ed. (2017), Does God Exist? (Montgomery, AL: Apologetics Press).
7 While the NKJV has “the Man” in vs. 31, the underlying Greek does not contain the article. Therefore, the ESV and NASB translate the underlying Greek as “a man.”
8 “κολλάω”: Frederick W. Danker (2000), A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature (Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press), third edition, revised and edited by Frederick William Danker, Logos Bible Software.
REPRODUCTION & DISCLAIMERS: We are happy to grant permission for this article to be reproduced in part or in its entirety, as long as our stipulations are observed.




